Amanda Marie; Simons

Nevada superior court
common law venue; original and exclusive jurisdiction
A superior court sitting as a 7th Amendment Common Law Court
organized by the people, for the people, in accordance with the unlimited powers (100 US 483)
of the Sovereign Citizens of the Republic
whose decisions cannot be reviewed by any other court in the land

* * * THIS IS AN IMPORTANT LAWFUL DOCUMENT – READ IT CAREFULLY * * *

You are hereby summoned and required to file with the Clerk of this court, at the address below, a WRITTEN ANSWER to a Complaint within TWENTY (20) DAYS after service of this summons on you.

You must mail a copy of your answer to the Complaint to the Demandant at the address shown above within TWENTY (20) DAYS after service of this summons on you.

If you intend to answer this matter, you should do so promptly so that your response may be filed on time. If you fail to answer within TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER SERVICE of the summons on you, judgement by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. A copy of said Complaint is attached.

Dated this 13th day of February, 2005

Defendants Addresses:
Attorney General
Governor - State of Utah
Lt. Governor - State of Utah
President - United States of America
Division of Child and Family Services
Salt Lake County Sheriffs Office
Psychologist
Christmas Box House
Primary Children's Hospital - Pediatrics Unit
Attorney
Judge R. S. Yeates
Foster Parents

Amanda Marie; Simons

Nevada superior court
common law venue; original and exclusive jurisdiction
A superior court sitting as a 7th Amendment Common Law Court
organized by the people, for the people, in accordance with the unlimited powers (100 US 483)
of the Sovereign Citizens of the Utah Republic
whose decisions cannot be reviewed by any other court in the land

Comes now the Demandant in the above-entitled matter and for cause of action alleges as follows:

1. That the Defendants have committed kidnapping and conspiracy to commit kidnapping in an ongoing criminal enterprise by performing acts that are above and beyond any such powers that can lawfully be granted to either the Federal Government and/or to any State Government by the Sovereign Citizens. See FACTS 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 66 of the Utah Truth Affidavit.

2. That the Defendants are committing fraud by representing to the Citizens that they have the power and the authority to perform these acts, even though they have admitted, through their failure to respond to the Truth Affidavits, that neither the Constitution for the State of Utah nor the Constitution for the United States of America does not grant any such authority because We the People do not hold such powers and therefore cannot grant such powers to any government.

3. That a Truth Affidavit was served on each Defendant on the 7th day of December, 2004 by registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, except Kelly and Kaye Record who were hand delivered a copy at a later date and George W. Bush who was served a separate Truth Affidavit on the 19th day of December, 2004 by e-mail with the auto-respond acknowledging the receipt of the said e-mail. Copies of the two Truth Affidavits are attached hereto for reference purposes only, and not for the purpose of allowing the Defendants any further opportunity to respond, since by their default, they have already contracted with the Demandant as to the truth of all facts contained in the said Truth Affidavits. Demandant hereby includes each and every one of the FACTS contained within the Truth Affidavits as an un-refutable part of this Complaint.

4. That the Defendants have wilfully, and repeatedly, violated their several Oaths of Office, as required by the Constitution for the State of Utah, and as administered to the President of the United States by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. See FACTS 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Truth Affidavit as well as Article IV, Section 10, of the Constitution for the State of Utah concerning the requirement for an Oath of Office.

5. The Defendants are either totally ignorant of the fact that they are Officers of the Utah republic, or they are ignoring the fact in order to gain personal profit, special privileges, honors, or aggrandizement above and beyond those available to the other Sovereign Citizens and in direct confrontation to the equality of all men declared in the Declaration of Independence, and as set forth in the Constitution for the United States of America. See FACTS 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of the Truth Affidavit along with the cite from the Constitution for the United States of America and the U. S. Supreme Court cite.

6. Pursuant to the True 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America, any person who claims a title of nobility, or honors (privileges) automatically loses their Citizenship and has no right to serve in any office of the Federal or State Government. See the Attached Documents Supporting the Missing 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United State of America. These Documents have already been adjudicated by the Common Law Jury and cannot be reviewed by any court in the land. See also, FACTS 17, 18 and 19 of the Truth Affidavit.

7. The Defendants have participated in the creation and enforcement of laws that are above and beyond the powers and authority granted by the Sovereign Citizens when the Constitution for the State of Utah and the Constitution for the United States of America were created. See FACTS 14, 15, and 16 of the Truth Affidavit.

8. Even though it is a basic fact that a person, or even a group of people, cannot grant something they do not have, the Defendants have persisted in performing actions that exceed what power and authority the People are able to grant to the State. No Sovereign Citizen has the right, or the power, to infringe upon the Sovereignty of another Sovereign Citizen. Even if all of the Citizens of the Utah republic vote to grant a right they do not have, they cannot grant it because not one single person has it. No person has the right to enter into my home and remove my children, or anything else that I own or control. The simple rule is that if a private citizen, or a group of citizens, do not have the right to do something, then the government cannot be granted the right to do that same something. See FACTS 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 66 of the Truth Affidavit.

9. The Defendants, through their unconstitutional actions, are participating in the persecution of the people of the Utah republic by enforcing, and attempting to pass off and enforce as laws, bills, regulations, codes, and other "color of law" documents that have no validity under the Constitution for the United States of America or the Constitution for the State of Utah, and are in fact, in direct violation of the unalienable rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence. See FACTS 55, 56, and 57 of the Truth Affidavit.

10. We fully understand and expect that the Defendants will either ignore this Summons and Complaint because it comes from a Common Law Court, or they will attack the validity of the Court because they know and understand that if the Common Law Courts exists the people really do control the actions and activities of the government employees. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the honors and privileges claimed by the attorneys cannot exist because the attorneys have no standing before a Common Law Court. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the judges cannot legislate from the bench because their decisions can, and will be, overturned by the Common Law Courts. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the bureaucrats cannot build their empires because their powers and authority are restricted. See FACTS 79 through 115 of the Truth Affidavit that shows conclusively that We the People retained all rights to the Common Law, and to the Common Law Courts, in order to maintain absolute control over the actions and activities of the government employees.

11. That since the Truth Affidavit, the Defendants have not only continued with their unconstitutional and unlawful actions, but have actually permitted grave life threatening actions to proceed against the 4 year old in that they are giving her a drug to induce sleep. The Food and Drug Administration and the Manufacturer of the drug, both say it should not be given to anyone under the age of 18. See the attached copy of the Prescription for the drug Trazadone.

12. That the Defendants have totally ignored all pleas, a writ of Habeas Corpus, letters, requests, and statements made by the Demandant concerning her children. See the attached letter from the Demandant to Judge Yeates.

WHEREFORE, in good faith, the Demandant asks for summary judgement, with prejudice, in the sum of TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($200,000,000.00) for each child as damages, punitive damages, heart-ache, and alienation of affection between me and my children, collection costs, pre-judgment interest, court costs, actual costs of collection as provided by the court, and immediate return of the two children.

Demandant also seeks a permanent Writ of Prohibition from the court that precludes the State of Utah, or any of its representatives from taking any action against me, my children, or any of my family or friends.

Demandant also seeks a Writ of Mandamus ordering the State of Utah to cease and desist from any and all actions that are outside the mandates and prohibitions established by the People of the Utah republic in the Constitution for the State of Utah.

Demandant further requests, because of the excessive abuse and violation of their Oaths of Office, that the Common Law Court cause such of its justices, as it feels necessary, be assigned to monitor the actions and activities of the various officers of the State of Utah in order to assure the People of the Utah republic that such actions and activities are within the bounds established in the Constitution for the State of Utah and the Constitution for the United States of America.

Dated this 13th day of February, 2005

_________________________________________
Amanda Marie; Simons

_________________________________________
James Comet; Barrus , Jr.

Amanda Marie; Simons
James Comet; Barrus, Jr.

Nevada superior court
common law venue; original and exclusive jurisdiction
A superior court sitting as a 7th Amendment Common Law Court
organized by the people, for the people, in accordance with the unlimited powers (100 US 483)
of the Sovereign Citizens of the Utah Republic
whose decisions cannot be reviewed by any other court in the land

Comes now the Demandants in the above-entitled matter and for cause of action petitions the court as follows:

On the 16th day of February, 2005 the Demandants caused a SUMMONS and COMPLAINT to be sent by registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, to each of the Defendants.

Defendants were granted the standard 20 days in which to answer the SUMMONS. No answer has been received as of this 13th day of March, 2005, which is 28 days.

Demandants petition the court for a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT AND ORDER OF RESTITUTION that establishes the truth of each and every statement set forth in the COMPLAINT and grants the Demandants all relief as sought.

1. That the Defendants have committed kidnapping and conspiracy to commit kidnapping in an ongoing criminal enterprise by performing acts that are above and beyond any such powers that can lawfully be granted to either the Federal Government and/or to any State Government by the Sovereign Citizens. See FACTS 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 66 of the Utah Truth Affidavit.

2. That the Defendants are committing fraud by representing to the Citizens that they have the power and the authority to perform these acts, even though they have admitted, through their failure to respond to the Truth Affidavits, that neither the Constitution for the State of Utah nor the Constitution for the United States of America does not grant any such authority because We the People do not hold such powers and therefore cannot grant such powers to any government.

3. That a Truth Affidavit was served on each Defendant on the 7th day of December, 2004 by registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, except Kelly and Kaye Record who were hand delivered a copy at a later date and George W. Bush who was served a separate Truth Affidavit on the 19th day of December, 2004 by e-mail with the auto-respond acknowledging the receipt of the said e-mail. Copies of the two Truth Affidavits are attached hereto for reference purposes only, and not for the purpose of allowing the Defendants any further opportunity to respond, since by their default, they have already contracted with the Demandant as to the truth of all facts contained in the said Truth Affidavits. Demandant hereby includes each and every one of the FACTS contained within the Truth Affidavits as an un-refutable part of this Complaint.

4. That the Defendants have wilfully, and repeatedly, violated their several Oaths of Office, as required by the Constitution for the State of Utah, and as administered to the President of the United States by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. See FACTS 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the Truth Affidavit as well as Article IV, Section 10, of the Constitution for the State of Utah concerning the requirement for an Oath of Office.

5. The Defendants are either totally ignorant of the fact that they are Officers of the Utah republic, or they are ignoring the fact in order to gain personal profit, special privileges, honors, or aggrandizement above and beyond those available to the other Sovereign Citizens and in direct confrontation to the equality of all men declared in the Declaration of Independence, and as set forth in the Constitution for the United States of America. See FACTS 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 of the Truth Affidavit along with the cite from the Constitution for the United States of America and the U. S. Supreme Court cite.

6. Pursuant to the True 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America, any person who claims a title of nobility, or honors (privileges) automatically loses their Citizenship and has no right to serve in any office of the Federal or State Government. See the Attached Documents Supporting the Missing 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United State of America. These Documents have already been adjudicated by the Common Law Jury and cannot be reviewed by any court in the land. See also, FACTS 17, 18 and 19 of the Truth Affidavit.

7. The Defendants have participated in the creation and enforcement of laws that are above and beyond the powers and authority granted by the Sovereign Citizens when the Constitution for the State of Utah and the Constitution for the United States of America were created. See FACTS 14, 15, and 16 of the Truth Affidavit.

8. Even though it is a basic fact that a person, or even a group of people, cannot grant something they do not have, the Defendants have persisted in performing actions that exceed what power and authority the People are able to grant to the State. No Sovereign Citizen has the right, or the power, to infringe upon the Sovereignty of another Sovereign Citizen. Even if all of the Citizens of the Utah republic vote to grant a right they do not have, they cannot grant it because not one single person has it. No person has the right to enter into my home and remove my children, or anything else that I own or control. The simple rule is that if a private citizen, or a group of citizens, do not have the right to do something, then the government cannot be granted the right to do that same something. See FACTS 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, and 66 of the Truth Affidavit.

9. The Defendants, through their unconstitutional actions, are participating in the persecution of the people of the Utah republic by enforcing, and attempting to pass off and enforce as laws, bills, regulations, codes, and other "color of law" documents that have no validity under the Constitution for the United States of America or the Constitution for the State of Utah, and are in fact, in direct violation of the unalienable rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence. See FACTS 55, 56, and 57 of the Truth Affidavit.

10. We fully understand and expect that the Defendants will either ignore this Summons and Complaint because it comes from a Common Law Court, or they will attack the validity of the Court because they know and understand that if the Common Law Courts exists the people really do control the actions and activities of the government employees. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the honors and privileges claimed by the attorneys cannot exist because the attorneys have no standing before a Common Law Court. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the judges cannot legislate from the bench because their decisions can, and will be, overturned by the Common Law Courts. Since the Common Law Courts do exist the bureaucrats cannot build their empires because their powers and authority are restricted. See FACTS 79 through 115 of the Truth Affidavit that shows conclusively that We the People retained all rights to the Common Law, and to the Common Law Courts, in order to maintain absolute control over the actions and activities of the government employees.

11. That since the Truth Affidavit, the Defendants have not only continued with their unconstitutional and unlawful actions, but have actually permitted grave life threatening actions to proceed against the 4 year old in that they are giving her a drug to induce sleep. The Food and Drug Administration and the Manufacturer of the drug, both say it should not be given to anyone under the age of 18. See the attached copy of the Prescription for the drug Trazadone.

12. That the Defendants have totally ignored all pleas, a writ of Habeas Corpus, letters, requests, and statements made by the Demandant concerning her children. See the attached letter from the Demandant to Judge Yeates.

WHEREFORE, in good faith, the Demandant asks for summary judgement, with prejudice, in the sum of TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($200,000,000.00) for each child as damages, punitive damages, heart-ache, and alienation of affection between me and my children, collection costs, pre-judgment interest, court costs, actual costs of collection as provided by the court, and immediate return of the two children.

Demandant also seeks a permanent Writ of Prohibition from the court that precludes the State of Utah, or any of its representatives from taking any action against me, my children, or any of my family or friends.

Demandant also seeks a Writ of Mandamus ordering the State of Utah to cease and desist from any and all actions that are outside the mandates and prohibitions established by the People of the Utah republic in the Constitution for the State of Utah.

Demandant further requests, because of the excessive abuse and violation of their Oaths of Office, that the Common Law Court cause such of its justices, as it feels necessary, be assigned to monitor the actions and activities of the various officers of the State of Utah in order to assure the People of the Utah republic that such actions and activities are within the bounds established in the Constitution for the State of Utah and the Constitution for the United States of America.

At this point my Affidavit to the various officers of the State of Utah is included.

The State of Utah is completely out of line, and WAY BEYOND any lawful powers that can or could be granted by We the People.

Again, I demand that my children be returned forthwith, and that the State of Utah and all of its officer heed and obey the Writs that I have presented.

At this point, Constitutional Concepts Foundations's "Open Letter and Official Notice to the Officers of the several States and of the Federal Government"

At this point the Affidavit to the Federal Officers is included

Unless you can show, by written rebuttal, exactly where in the Constitution for the united States of America (the organic Constitution), not in some law that has been enacted because someone thought they might have the power to do these things, you are SPECIFICALLY empowered and authorized to pass laws concerning the kidnapping of our children, the regulation of our banking, the regulation of the sales of stocks and securities, and the establishment of a police force, the establishment of a prison system, where you are permitted to suspend the use of Gold and Silver coin, and where you were granted any power to assign any of your mandated duties, you are hereby specifically mandated to close those unconstitutional operations immediately, and to cease and desist from performing any act in contravention to the powers and authority granted by We the People.

Furthermore, You may not provide further funding or other activities of support to these unconstitutional actions.
In short:

Shut down the Securities and Exchange Commission. You have no right to regulate any of the business activities of the General Partners of We the People.

Suspend all police actions against any private individuals who are members of We the People. We would not, and We did not, grant you any power to invade, or to even infringe upon, our Sovereignty. This does not interfere with your ability to protect us against terrorism. You still have the power to pursue individuals who would harm us, but be very sure, and very careful that you do not tread on our Sovereignty in accomplishing this.

Close down the regulatory structure for the regulation of banking. You have no right to regulate the business activities of the General Partners, nor can you place any type of restrictions on their lawful business activities. We claimed the right of Pursuit of Happiness in the Declaration of Independence and are not interested in having our public servants invade, or infringe upon, that right.

Immediately restore the use of Gold and Silver coins as the true and proper medium of exchange. Cancel all debt incurred to the Federal Reserve System without any further payment. You had no authority to assign any of your power to the Federal Reserve, and so it was beyond your granted powers to do so. Therefore all of your actions in this regard are null and void.

In the case of the prison system, each prisoner shall be entitled to present a written document to the nearest, or most convenient, Common Law Court, which is the true venue for any actions concerning the Sovereign People, requesting a review of his, or her, case. Disposition will be made by the Common Law Court based on the rules of Common Law. At such time as each prisoner shall have had "their day in the true court of jurisdiction" then you will cease and desist in any further actions in the operation or establishment of prisons.

Remember, you, and each of you, are the validly elected and appointed officers of the republic. You are paid by the General Partners of We the People. As such you are severally and Individually responsible to the General Partners of We the People, and ABSOLUTELY MUST obey the Mandates issued by the Sovereign We the People, and you must adhere to the Prohibitions that have been placed against your actions outside the bounds set forth in the Constitution.

I James Comet; Barrus, Jr., Affiant, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C., Sec. 1746 (1) and executed "without the UNITED STATES', state under penalty of perjury pursuant to the Laws of the united States of America, that I am competent to be a witness and that the facts contained herein are true, correct, complete and not misleading, to the best of Affiants' first-hand knowledge and belief.

Therefore, the court determines the following to be the truth in all matters concerned herewith.

Even though this action is primarily against the Federal Government and the State of Utah, because of the fact that a Truth Affidavit was served on the President of the United States and no answer was received, and that later a SUMMONS and COMPLAINT were served on the President of the United States, and still no answer was received, this court has determined that its ORDER will be directed to the Federal Government and to each and every one of the Several States since they consider the Constitution for the United States of America to be the valid law of the land.

That the Defendants, through bogus Statutes and Codes purporting to "Protect the Children", have committed kidnapping and conspiracy to commit kidnapping, in an ongoing criminal enterprise, by performing acts that are above and beyond any such powers that can lawfully be granted to either the Federal Government and/or to any State Government by the Sovereign Citizens.

That the Defendants are committing fraud by representing that they have the power and the authority to perform these acts, even though they have admitted, through their failure to respond to the Truth Affidavits, that neither the Constitution for any of the several States, nor the Constitution for the United States of America, can possibly grant any such authority because We the People do not hold such powers and therefore cannot grant such powers to any government.

That all Truth Affidavits were properly served by registered United States Mail, return receipt requested, or by hand delivery, or, in the case of George W. Bush, President of the United States of America, it was served by e-mail with the auto-respond acknowledging the receipt of the said e-mail. Each and every one of the FACTS contained within the Truth Affidavits are hereby established as un-refutable truths by this court.

That the Defendants have wilfully, and repeatedly, violated their several Oaths of Office, as required by the various Constitutions. and as administered to the President of the United States by the Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court.

The Defendants are either totally ignorant of the fact that they are Officers of the several State republics, or of the Federal republic. Whether they are ignoring that fact in order to gain personal profit, special privileges, honors, or aggrandizement above and beyond those available to the other Sovereign Citizens and in direct confrontation to the equality of all men declared in the Declaration of Independence, and as set forth in the Constitution for the United States of America is immaterial. They are hereby ordered to cease and desist in all actions, activities, and functions that are outside the boundaries established in their particular Constitution.

Pursuant to the True 13th Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America, any person who claims a title of nobility, or honors (privileges) automatically loses their Citizenship and has no right to serve in any office of the Federal or State Government. These Documents have already been adjudicated by the Common Law Jury and cannot be reviewed by any court in the land. We, the justices of the Superior Common Law Court of the Nevada republic are aware of the fact that most people are not aware of this Amendment as it has been unlawfully hidden for many years, do hereby order that each Attorney publish in their local paper a statement that says they have abandoned the use of the Title of Nobility, Esquire, and have no allegiance to any Government other that the republic that the pledge their allegiance to. The Attorneys shall have one year from the date hereof to so publish or they shall be stripped of their Citizenship in accordance with the provisions of the true 13th Amendment.

The Defendants have participated in the creation and enforcement of laws that are above and beyond the powers and authority granted by the Sovereign Citizens when the several Constitutions were created. In doing so they have created an atmosphere of fear and distrust of all Governments within the United States of America. Again, we order that all unconstitutional actions cease immediately.

Even though it is a basic fact that a person, or even a group of people, cannot grant something they do not have. The Defendants have persisted in performing actions that exceed what power and authority the People are able to grant. No Sovereign Citizen has the right, or the power, to infringe upon the Sovereignty of another Sovereign Citizen. Even if all of the Citizens of the republic were to vote to grant a right they do not have, they cannot grant that right because not one single person has it. No person has the right to enter into a home and remove the children, or anything else owned or controlled by a Sovereign Citizen. The simple rule is that if a private citizen, or a group of citizens, do not have the right to do something, then the government cannot be granted the right to do that same something.

The Defendants, through their unconstitutional actions, are participating in the persecution of the people by enforcing, and attempting to pass off and enforce as valid laws, bills, regulations, codes, executive orders, and other "color of law" documents that have no validity under the Constitution for the United States of America or the Constitution for the several States, and are in fact, in direct violation of the unalienable rights set forth in the Declaration of Independence. We hereby order that only laws that have been properly passed by the Legislature in compliance with the provisions set forth in the various Constitutions must be obeyed by the Sovereign Citizens, and even then, only if the legislature has the requisite power and authority under the provisions of the Constitutional Law establish by We, the People, in the various Constitutions.

We reiterate the fact that there is a clear separation between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Governments. All attempts by any branch to infringe upon the powers granted to another branch will be held as unconstitutional, and of no force or effect.

We fully understand and expect that the Defendants will either try to ignore this Default Judgment and Order of Restitution because it comes from a Common Law Court, or they will attack the validity of the Court because they know and understand that if the Common Law Courts exist, then the people really do control the actions and activities of the government employees. Since the Common Law Courts really do exist the honors and privileges claimed by the attorneys cannot exist because the attorneys have no standing before a Common Law Court. Since the Common Law Courts really do exist the judges cannot legislate from the bench because their decisions can, and will be, overturned by the Common Law Courts. Since the Common Law Courts really do exist the bureaucrats cannot build their empires because their powers and authority are restricted.

The Truth Affidavits show conclusively that We the People retained all rights to the Common Law, and to the Common Law Courts, in order to maintain absolute control over the actions and activities of the government employees.

We are appalled at the blatant abuse of the children of Amanda Marie; Simons by the State of Utah. The mere thought that a 4 year old would be drugged with adult medicine is beyond comprehension. Therefore, the Demandants are hereby awarded a summary judgement, with prejudice, in the sum of TWO HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS ($200,000,000.00) for each child as damages, punitive damages, heart-ache, and alienation of affection, collection costs, pre-judgment interest, court costs, actual costs of collection as provided by the court.

This Court orders the immediate return of the two children to their mother.

Demandants are granted a permanent Writ of Prohibition that precludes the Federal Government or the Government of any of the several States, or any of their representatives from taking any action against the Demandants, or any of their family or friends.

This court hereby issues a Writ of Mandamus ordering the several States, and the Federal Government, to cease and desist from any and all actions that are outside the mandates and prohibitions established by the People in the various Constitutions.

This court further rules that Sovereign Citizens in each community across America have the unalienable right to monitor the actions and activities of the various officers of the Federal Government and of the several State Governments by entering into any and all meetings, sessions, and work places established by such Government, in order to assure the People of America that all actions and activities of our Public Employees are within the bounds established by us in the Constitutions for the several States and the Constitution for the United States of America.

We further rule that there can be no immunity from prosecution for acts done outside the provisions of the Constitution. It is not possible for an employee to tell the boss that he has no authority to reprimand, or fire, him when he has violated the rules set down by the employer. Any Public Servant who has violated the terms and conditions of his Oath of Office is subject to immediate dismissal. If the Public Servant feels he has been wronged then he, like any other Citizen, may bring his complaint to this Court for presentation of the facts.

Dated this 13th day of March, 2005

Properly executed by all 12 justices who comprised the Common Law Jury referenced in Article 7 of the Bill of Rights.

I, ___________________________________duly appointed and commissioned, hereby witness to the above signatures, being the one's identified as the Justices, called by Clark county common law court on this _____ day of ____________________, Anno domini 2005, and called to order to hear and establish the facts as stated herein, and as those facts being true, correct and certain, to any matter relating to the present status of our Constitution.

TO WIT: ___________________________________________

Under the full Faith and Credit of the several states.

___________________________________________
Common law Notary

My commission expires________________________

fee_________